Praktek Akad Mukhabarah Berbasis Adat Lokal (Studi Kasus di Pariangan Kabupaten Tanah Datar)
Sari
This study aims to analyze the practice of mukhabarah in agricultural cooperation and to assess its conformity with the principles of fiqh muʿāmalah and Islamic economic justice. The research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive-analytical design. Data were collected through fourteen in-depth interviews with tenant farmers, landowners, and community leaders, and were supported by field observations and literature review. Data analysis was conducted using the interactive analysis model of Miles and Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that mukhabarah practices in the field are generally carried out informally without written contracts, with profit-sharing mechanisms that are not clearly agreed upon from the outset and risk-sharing arrangements that tend to place a disproportionate burden on tenant farmers. This condition reflects a gap between the normative concept of mukhabarah in fiqh muʿāmalah and the empirical realities of agricultural practices. From the perspective of Islamic economic justice and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, mukhabarah practices have not yet fully functioned as instruments for economic protection and empowerment of tenant farmers. This study underscores the importance of a contextual approach in evaluating sharia-based contracts, so that they are not only formally valid but also substantively just
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Ahmed, H. (2016). Islamic finance, risk sharing, and social justice. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 12(2), 1–15.
Amanto, B., & Yasin, M. (2022). Praktik akad mukhabarah dalam perspektif hukum Islam (Studi kasus masyarakat agraris). Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 13(1), 45–60.
Ascarya. (2017). The development of Islamic financial system in Indonesia and the way forward. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 3(1), 1–28.
Auda, J. (2016). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach (Revised ed.). London: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Bernstein, H. (2018). Class dynamics of agrarian change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Chapra, M. U. (2016). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.
Cleaver, F. (2017). Development through bricolage: Rethinking institutions for natural resource management. London: Routledge.
Hall, D., Hirsch, P., & Li, T. M. (2015). Powers of exclusion: Land dilemmas in Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Hasanuddin, H. A., et al. (2025). Islamic sharecropping practices: Evidence from Indonesian local communities. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Syariah, 7(1), 23–39.
Hidayat, S., & Al-Mansur, F. (2020). Maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and economic justice: A contemporary approach. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 4(2), 87–104.
Huda, N., Anggraini, D., Ali, K. M., Mardoni, Y., & Rini, N. (2019). Keuangan publik Islam: Pendekatan teoritis dan sejarah. Jakarta: Kencana.
Kamali, M. H. (2018). Shariah law: An introduction. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Khan, M. F., & Bashar, O. K. (2020). Islamic economics and distributive justice: Theory and practice. Journal of King Abdulaziz University: Islamic Economics, 33(2), 3–22.
Laldin, M. A., & Furqani, H. (2018). Developing Islamic finance in the framework of maqasid al-shariah. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 371–386.
Oktaviani, R., Rahman, A., & Sari, D. P. (2024). Assessment of agricultural collaboration practices and farmers’ income in Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 9(2), 112–128.
Ridwan, M., & Vania, A. (2023). Sharia compliance and economic efficiency in Minangkabau traditional sharecropping. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 19(1), 67–86.
Sa’diah, N., & Huda, M. (2022). Profit-sharing practice in mukhabarah contract: An empirical study. Jurnal Mu‘amalat, 14(2), 101–118.
Sadeq, A. H. M. (2017). Poverty alleviation and social justice in Islamic economics. Humanomics, 33(1), 2–15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/yume.v9i1.11099
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.

Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional

